Flying Missile Defense? The F-35 Stealth Fighter Can Do Everything

by Michael Peck

Key point: Missile defense is expanding the repertoire of F-35 missions.

Add another mission to the F-35.

On top of being a stealth fighter, bomber and airborne quarterback coordinating other aircraft, now it’s a missile defense sensor. The U.S. Army recently incorporated Air Force F-35s into its missile defense system.

“Two U.S. Air Force F-35s were integrated with the U.S. Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS), providing an airborne sensor capability to successfully detect, track and intercept near-simultaneous air-breathing threats in a test at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico,” according to an announcement by Lockheed Martin, manufacturer of the F-35 and a member of the multi-company team working on IBCS. “The December 2019 test marked the first time F-35s were used as sensors during an IBCS live-fire test against multiple airborne targets.”

“Linking F-35s to IBCS via the Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL) provided enhanced situational awareness and weapons-quality track data to engage airborne targets. The proof of concept demonstration used experimental equipment developed by Lockheed Martin, including the Harvest Lightning Ground Station and IBCS adaptation kit (A-Kit).”

“This test represents a major milestone for multi-domain operations by leveraging airborne assets to detect and track threats that can then be countered with ground-based effectors. This demonstrates a tremendous capability to defeat threats that are terrain masked or beyond ground-based sensor detection capabilities due to terrain and curvature of the earth,” said Jay Pitman, vice president, Lower Tier Integrated Air and Missile Defense at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control.

The December 2019 test follows an August 2019 Air Force exercise in which an F-35 transmitted tracking data to IBCS.

However, while the F-35s detected airborne targets, it’s not precisely clear what they detected. Lockheed Martin referred to “air-breathing targets,” which suggests drones or cruise missiles with air-breathing engines, rather than ballistic missiles.

Nonetheless, there are four key points here. The first is simply the idea of using aircraft as elevated radar stations. They can peer down to detect low-flying missiles and drones whose approach would otherwise be masked from ground-based radar by terrain or the Earth’s curvature.

But using fighters as airborne sensors for ground-based defenses against drones and missiles is an intriguing idea. That’s the sort of mission meant for the big E-3 AWACS and E-8 JSTARS airborne early warning aircraft, which can use their powerful radars to detect cruise missiles. But there are only a few dozen of these flying radar stations, they’ll be prime targets for the enemy, and they’re likely to have more pressing tasks in wartime than spotting drones.

While their radars are less powerful than those on the AWACS, the F-35 will be the backbone of American tactical airpower: with 2,400 or so potentially on order, there’s bound to be one available as an airborne spotter for ground-based air defenses. Interestingly, the Air Force is also mounting new radars on old F-16s that will enable them to detect drones and cruise missiles.

The Army tests also highlight what’s supposed to be the F-35’s strong suit: its sensors – including AESA radar, infrared and cameras – and sophisticated networking capabilities. If the F-35’s numerous current bugs can be fixed, then it should be capable of serving as early warning for ground-based missiles and lasers, or jammers to stop enemy drones.

Finally, missile defense also expands the repertoire of F-35 missions. It’s not uncommon with controversial weapons for the military to find tasks to justify their cost. The F-35 wasn’t designed for missile and drone defense, but this task will likely be used as one more reason to continue the procurement of the aircraft.

Remote ATC Testing to Begin at Northern Colorado Regional Airport

New mobile tower is first phase of eventual remote tower service.

By Dan Pimentel February 25, 2020

Pilots who are used to flying into Northern Colorado Regional Airport (KFNL) near Fort Collins/Loveland—and operating there like they would at any non-towered airport—will need to take careful note of major air traffic control changes coming soon to the airport. Beginning in mid-March, KFNL becomes a “towered” airport with the addition of a mobile ATC trailer (MATCT) providing on-site services. The trailer and local controllers will eventually give way to a remote ATC facility as part of a test being conducted at the airport.

Initially, local controllers in the trailer will handle the traffic, while evaluators employed by Searidge Technologies of Ottawa, Ontario, will conduct “passive” operations from a remote facility. This summer and fall, a second phase of testing begins when ATC services will be provided by the remote tower, with local controllers in the MATCT acting as back-up. As testing progresses, full-time ATC services will eventually be through the remote tower only as Searidge pursues certification of the technology from FAA.

According to the Colorado Department of Transportation, the Colorado Remote Tower Project is a “first of its kind” design that integrates both satellite-based aircraft surveillance technology with ground-based video technology. For the tests to be conducted at KFNL, there will be three 360-degree panoramic video and static cameras securely mounted atop steel masts that will rise between 22 and 56 feet above the ground, simulating the same view one would expect if looking from a physical air traffic control tower. The camera and satellite-based surveillance data will then be fed to a remotely-located control center. During the test and assessment phase of this project, the control room will reside on airport property, but will accurately simulate a remote scenario. Future control centers can be located from a remote location.

KFNL was chosen as the test airport for the Colorado Remote Tower Project after a thorough site selection process in 2015 conducted in collaboration with FAA’s Nextgen office. The airport is jointly owned and operated by the cities of Fort Collins and Loveland and sees approximately 85,000 to 95,000 takeoffs and landings per year. A total of nearly 265 aircraft are based at the airport, which serves users ranging from privately-owned aircraft, commercial airliners, military aircraft, pilot training, and helicopters. The airport is home to three flight schools, specialized aircraft maintenance services, and a 24/7 fixed base operator (FBO)

In July of 2017, following significant efforts to develop the project requirements and scope, the FAA selected Searidge Technologies to design, install, test, and certify the remote tower equipment being tested at KFNL. Other partners in the project include William E. Payne & Associates, FAA, National Air Traffic Controllers Association, Northern Colorado Regional Airport administration, and the Colorado Division of Aeronautics.

Northern Colorado is one of the most rapidly developing regions of the state, according to CODOT, with the Colorado Division of Local Affairs and State Demography Office projecting that populations for the area are expected to more than double by the year 2050. “A growing population of this magnitude will result in increased demand for all modes of transportation, including air transportation. The Colorado Remote Tower Project is a proactive measure designed to address the future increase in aircraft operations at KFNL with dramatically reduced costs compared to constructing, maintaining and staffing a physical air traffic control tower,” CODOT said.

The mobile tower’s hours of operation will be 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time effective March 16, handling traffic on 118.4 MHz. Other frequencies include 121.65 MHz for ground, 135.075 MHz for ATIS, and 122.95 MHz for unicom. The common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) of 122.7 MHz will be eliminated when ATC services begin being provided by local controllers in the MATCT.

US bomber to feature in Warbirds Over Wanaka 2020

An iconic US bomber plane is set to grace this year’s Warbirds Over Wanaka airshow in a first for New Zealand.

Organisers have confirmed a United States Air Force B-52 Strotofortress bomber will feature in the April event.

The American B-52 Stratofortress bomber is scheduled to feature in Warbirds Over Wanaka 2020.
Warbirds Over Wanaka general manager Ed Taylor said it was a coup for the airshow.

“This is absolutely brilliant news for us and will quite possibly be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for our visitors to see one of these magnificent aircraft display here in our own backyard,” Taylor said.

The United States Air Force (USAF) earlier announced it would also be bringing a C-130J-30 Super Hercules transport aircraft to the show.

The Royal Australian Air Force would be bringing its F/A-18 Hornet fighter jets to Wanaka 2020 with a four-ship display, while the Royal New Zealand Air Force confirmed it would be having as many of its aircraft types as possible at Wanaka.

Ed Taylor said this year’s event would also feature the return of a Polikarpov I-16 Russian fighter, two Spitfires and the newly imported Yak-3 “Steadfast” making its Wanaka debut.

The Boeing B-52, informally referred to as the BUFF (Big Ugly Fat Fella), made its maiden flight in 1952.

It celebrated 60 years of continuous service with the USAF in 2015 and after undergoing upgrades around that time it is expected to still be serving into the 2050s. That would make it the longest-serving bomber aircraft in history.

Superior performance at high subsonic speeds and relatively low operating costs have contributed its longevity, despite the introduction of more advanced aircraft such as the Mach 2+ B-1 and the stealth B-2 Spirit.

The B-52 was originally designed to drop nuclear weapons, but it has only dropped conventional weapons in the several conflicts it has been used in.

The aircraft will not be carrying any weapons for the New Zealand flyover.

Warbirds Over Wanaka International Airshow is being held at Wanaka Airport on April 10th, 11th and 12th.

For F-22 and F-35 demo pilots, aggressive manoeuvres are just part of the job

By 13 February 2020

For US Marine Corps (USMC) F-35B demo pilot Captain Taylor Zehrung, and US Air Force (USAF) F-22 demo pilot Major Joshua Gunderson, aggressive flight manoeuvres, such as the ones displayed at the Singapore air show, are just part of the everyday job of combat aviation.

Both pilots say what was asked of them could be performed by any members of their squadrons.

F-22-Raptor-003

Source: BillyPix

The Lockheed Martin F-22.

“Our demos are designed to demonstrate what the aircraft can do in a combat scenario,” says Gunderson. “Everything is very specific in terms of airspeed, altitudes, [and] parameters, because I’m making sure it’s repeatable and executable and safe. But you can take any pilot in the F-22 community, give them a couple rides in this and they’ll be proficient at doing it.”

In particular, the pilots say the manoeuvres are something that are practiced regularly in combat exercises.

“The minimum radius turn we definitely use in basic fighter manoeuvres against other aircraft,” says Gunderson. “What’s great about the F-22 is our thrust out of the back end. The flight control computers allow us to turn very quickly in a very tight space, which gives us an advantage in the fight.”

The Lockheed Martin F-22 has two Pratt & Whitney F119 engines which each produce 35,000lb-thrust (156kN).

Gunderson also highlighted the J-Turn, a manoeuvre where the F-22 rockets upward at a high angle of attack, stalls and then pivots in a new direction while falling back to earth using its fly-by-wire flight controls and thrust-vectored jet engines.

F-35-Lightning-004

Source: BillyPix

A US Marine Corps F-35B at the Singapore Airshow 2020.

“That’d be an example where you can quickly change your nose position, whether you want to get weapons on something, or just continue to get an offensive position really quickly,” says Gunderson.

For F-35B pilot Zehrung learning short-take-off-and-vertical-landing (STOVL) manoeuvres, including the in-flight hover, took some getting used to. The F-35B can hover and complete STOVL manoeuvres using a shaft-driven lift fan system in its body and thrust-vectored tail exhaust.

“The very first time I ever did it, it was very weird being in fighter jet and not moving,” he says. “But it’s become pretty normal now.”

F-22 pilot Gunderson is the USAF F-22 Demonstration Team commander and is based at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Hampton, Virginia. F-22 pilots perform aerial displays as part of two-year rotations.

F-35B pilot Zehrung is part of the USMC’s F-35B Lighting II aerial demonstration team, which is part of attack squadron 121 at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan. F-35B pilots are asked to fly at air shows on an ad hoc basis.

High-flying fare planned for air show

Teams from Navy, Army are among attractions

LANCASTER — Demonstrations of the Navy’s newest fighter, an Army parachute team, an aerobatic pilot fresh off of the Top Gun sequel and World War II pilot training — all these attractions have been added to the bill for the Los Angeles County Air Show “Aerospace Valley USA” arriving next month.

The air show, on March 21 and 22 at Gen. William J. Fox Field in Lancaster, will also feature as the headlining act the Navy’s precision flight team, the Blue Angels.

“This year’s goal is to knock the socks off the aviation enthusiast, and that’s not an easy task here in Aerospace Valley,” Los Angeles County Air Show Board President Mike VanKirk said. “For those of us who live here, we’re blessed to see some of the world’s top aircraft fly on a regular basis, but I’m thrilled to say the 2020 show is shaping up to be one of the most exciting air shows in the country.”

In addition to the Blue Angels, the Navy’s F-35C demonstration team from Naval Air Station Lemoore, California, will showcase the service’s latest fighter. The F-35C is the Navy variant of the joint strike fighter, which also has versions for the Air Force and Marine Corps, as well as several international partners.

This is the first year the Navy has fielded a F-35C team for air shows.

Another first for this year’s show is an appearance by the Army’s Golden Knights Parachute Team, made up of demonstration and competition parachutists drawn from all parts of the U.S. Army.

Aerobatic pilot Chuck Coleman returns to the Los Angeles County Air Show this year. The local pilot has performed throughout the country and has been involved most recently in making the upcoming “Top Gun” sequel.

Coleman served as the aerobatic flight instructor for the “Tom Cruise School of Flying” in his Extra 300L airplane and performed in more than 140 flights with the actors.

These performers are in addition to the previously announced Air Force F-22 Raptor Demonstration Team, “Tora! Tora! Tora!” warbirds, Alabama Boys, Rob Harrison The Tumbling Bear and Vicky Benzing flying her Stearman biplane.

On the ground, a new display will tell the story of War Eagle Field, the World War II flying school for Royal Air Force pilots in Lancaster. The display, a joint effort with the Antelope Valley Rural Museum, will detail the Polaris Flight Academy and its cadre of British and Canadian fliers.

The popular Heroes and Legends history panels will feature discussions on subjects as varied as the U-2 spy plane, women in aviation and War Eagle Field.

The interactive STEM Expo continues to expand, offering hands-on activities in science, technology, engineering and math.

“For the first time in the Air Show’s history, we’re offering public premium seating, so folks will be able to get a fence line view, seating and other amenities,” VanKirk said. “It’s not just the ‘In the Sky’ show, but our ‘On the Ground’ static displays, Heroes and Legends History panel, interactive STEM, and great food that make a perfect recipe for an amazing event. Our robust line-up including the 2020 is an exciting year for all aerospace enthusiasts.”

SUPER BOWL ’19 – Excitement Builds For Those Viewing USAF Flyover From Inside Closed Dome!

Hotlanta, GA – It’s football time in the U.S.A and we can’t think of anything to compliment beer, pizza and ball better than a totally badass flyover of the event by the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds!

This year’s Super Bowl takes place inside the Mercedez-Benz Stadium, a closed dome perfect for observing the big moment. While part of the roof can be retracted for optimal flyover viewing, Erik Tinkelstein, NFL senior director of event operations, says – why bother!

“We would love to have it open,” Tinkelstein said (actual quote), before listing all of the reasons they probably aren’t going to do that (true story).

His decision hasn’t dampened the excitement of fans, though, who all eagerly anticipate watching the half million dollar demonstration from inside the closed-roof dome.

“This is going to be awesome!” said Mark Fartonelli, 63. “I’m a huge aviation buff and former USAF, so I really can’t wait to witness this moment through the ceiling.”

Sally McMallen, 45, said that this is actually one of the main reasons she caved and bought tickets for her family. “I mean, I’m sure the game will be fun and all too, but you don’t get to see something like this from inside of a completely encapsulated building every day!”

Her husband, Nathan McMallen, 46, added, “We have two boys and I’m guessing when they see the performance happening on the other side of the roof it will inspire them to become pilots themselves.”

One man we met with, obviously suffering from early onset dementia, seemed a bit confused by the whole thing. “I’m sorry, what?” said, Jack Johnson, 28. “How does that even work? Are they going to be handing out special wall-penetration glasses or something?”

We tiptoed away from mentally unwell Johnson and moved on to someone able to explain exactly how this would work, the operations officer charged with planning the flyover, Lt. Col. Erik Garney.

“The trickiest part is getting the timing just right,” Garney said in regards to ensuring that fans can see the planes through the ceiling. “The first thing to remember is we’re going 400 mph. So we can’t just stop and hover.”
(real quotes)

Mikael Arnoldo, veteran football director, chimed in. “That flyover happens in about two seconds, so you better be on it because they’re not going to circle around the stadium and do it again for you.” (also a real quote)

In other words, look up fast inside the dome or you’ll miss the whole thing!

We aren’t worried about missing anything, though. With enough booze in us, Aviation Daily not only sees through walls, we stumble right through them.

Amsterdam Air Traffic Control

AMSTERDAM AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL VISIT

Amsterdam is Europe’s busiest airport in terms of movements and top 3 in terms of passenger numbers; in 2018, it handled over 70 million passengers with over 500,000 movements. I visited the Air Traffic Control Tower and Approach Centre in Amsterdam, to find out how the air traffic is managed in one of the busiest European Airports.

At 101 meters above ground, this impressive air traffic control tower is the tallest one in the Netherlands. The team ensures that safe traffic flows within a 15 kilometre radius around the Amsterdam Airport of Schiphol, on a daily basis.

Actually, there are two towers in operation due to the lay out of the airport and its runways; one at Schiphol-Centre and one near the Polder Runway (runway 18R/36L).

The newly upgraded control tower at the Schiphol Centre has 15 positions. During my visit, there were 6 controllers working at one time:

  • 2 controllers working on ground (North and South)
  • 1 working as departure clearance delivery
  • 1 working as runway planner
  • 1 working as tower
  • 1 working as tower assistant
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower

Amsterdam Schiphol has 6 runways in total

  • 18L/36R
  • 18C/36C
  • 18R/36L
  • 06/24
  • 09/27
  • 04/22 (used by general aviation but mainly for private aviation)

The wind and weather are the biggest challenges at Schiphol and there could be many runway changes during one day. Due to noise probation, only 3 runways are used at any one point.

During departure peak, 2 runways will be assigned for departure and 1 runway for arrival. Inversely during arrival peak, 2 runways will be assigned for arrival and 1 runway for departure.

Runway 18R/36L is located far away from the centre, hence why there is another control tower dedicated for this runway.

The ATC planner does a good job at optimising the runway usage, ensuring that planes do not hold too long on the taxiway; thus reducing fuel burn on the taxiway. However, if runway 18R/36L is in use (Polder runway) taxi time can be 15 minutes from the terminal.

Schiphol handles around 1500 traffic movements on an average day, it was quite intensive during peaks of inbound and outbound. The capacity is about 110-120 planes per hour.

There are 6 concourses in Schiphol, they are Concourse B, C, D, E, F, and G. You can get a good 360 degree view from the tower to all the concourses.

Schiphol Concourse B
Schiphol Concourse C and D
Schiphol Concourse E
Schiphol Concourse F
Schiphol Concourse G
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Control Tower

I also visited the Schiphol approach (Radar) centre in Schiphol East, which directs departing aircraft from Schiphol to the air routes. It also directs approaching aircraft to the immediate vicinity of Schiphol. In other words, the approach centre works together with the tower and they handover traffic to each other.

In the approach centre, there is an approach section and an area control section.

For an outbound aircraft, after departure, the tower will hand over the plane to the approach section, then to area control (up to 24,500 ft) and then finally to Euro Control, which sits above in Maastricht.

For an inbound aircraft, area control will guide the plane to one of three fixes. The approach centre will then guide the plane for approach and hand over to the tower for final landing.

Although they have the name “approach” the center works on both arriving and departing traffic.

Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Approach Center
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Approach Center
Amsterdam Schiphol Air Traffic Approach Center
Area Control working on Radar Screen
Approach section on radar center
Approach section on radar center

What the ATC controller sees – tech in the tower

It’s quite normal to be nervous the first time you tune in a new ATC frequency and call the control tower to request a landing clearance, or when you request flight following from the approach controller on a cross-country. Fortunately, as with most skills in aviation, you’ll soon feel comfortable with these procedures after some practice and coaching from your instructor.

You’ll find that it’s also helpful to have a good understanding of the air traffic system from the controller’s perspective. While it may have all started with a controller standing on an elevated platform with a pair of binoculars, today’s system is heavily dependent on advanced technology. Understanding the systems involved will not only make you feel more comfortable working with ATC but will also allow you to take full advantage of all the services and information they have to offer.

Ground controllers

Let’s first take a look at the ground controllers, who are in charge of directing traffic along the taxiways at towered airports. They are typically positioned in the control tower and visually track your position.

At larger airports, though, it can be tough for them to see you from the tower when the end of the runway may be several miles away. These larger airports have Surface Movement Radar (SMR), such as ASDE-3, AMASS, or ASDE-X, designed to display the location of aircraft and vehicles on the ground. These are used by the ground controllers as an additional tool to track ground traffic, particularly at night or in poor visibility. Older systems will display a map of the airport and the target:

Newer systems include the capability to display higher quality mapping, radar target, data blocks, safety alerts, and to interface with other systems such as digital flight strips:

The newer ASDE-X systems rely on your transponder for positive identification, so it’s important that you follow the instructions on the airport diagram and set it to altitude reporting mode when taxiing on the surface.

Approach Controllers

As a pilot, it can be helpful to understand what the controller sees on his display while talking to you on the frequency. There will be a data block associated with your aircraft’s location on the screen that moves as the aircraft moves through the airspace. The data block includes the aircraft N#, altitude, groundspeed, destination airport and aircraft type.

For unidentified VFR aircraft flying near the TRACON airspace, the controller will only be able to see the groundspeed and altitude (if equipped with an altitude-reporting transponder). The controller will use the term “unverified” when issuing traffic advisories.

If an extenuating circumstance requires you to squawk one of the special transponder codes, your aircraft data block will be highlighted with special codes. In this example an airplane is squawking 7700, as denoted by the red letters “EM”, standing for emergency, above the data block.

Many approach radar systems also display real-time precipitation and intensity levels on the screen in relation to aircraft location. Don’t hesitate to ask the controller about what they’re seeing and if they have a recommendation for a route that avoids nearby precipitation or thunderstorms.

In addition to using the radar system to track the location of aircraft, many TRACONs are also receiving a traffic feed from the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) system. Instead of using ground-based radar to determine aircraft position, ADS-B relies on aircraft equipped with new GPS transponders, which report precise 3D position data to a nationwide network of ADS-B towers on the ground. This ADS-B traffic information is then sent to each Air Traffic Control facility and will soon be the primary source of air traffic data.

Talking to the tower

At smaller ATC tower-controlled airports, the controllers must visually identify the location of inbound aircraft and often use binoculars to help spot traffic. For this reason, it’s important that you make accurate position reports to the controllers to help them establish an accurate mental picture of the traffic around the airport.

While Class D airport towers typically don’t have a radar service located right on the field, those that are near a Class C or B airport may have a direct feed from that radar to help with identifying traffic. While they are not authorized to issue VFR airplanes a unique transponder code, they may ask you to “IDENT” on the transponder to help identify your airplane’s position on the radar screen.

From a weather perspective, tower controllers at many Class B airports also have access to information from a supplemental weather resource called Terminal Doppler Weather Radar, or TDWR. These are radars specifically designed to detect wind shear and microburst events near major airports and provide controllers with high-resolution precipitation data. There are 45 operational TDWRs in the United States, primarily near large, international airports where thunderstorms occur numerous times each year.

Controllers have access to this TDWR data on dedicated display terminals, which can assist in determining the optimum traffic flow during periods of rapidly changing inclement weather.

Visit an ATC facility

Want to take the next step in expanding your ATC knowledge? Take the time to visit your local ATC tower, TRACON or center facility. You’re going to be working closely with the controllers on the radio and it really helps the relationship to meet and talk with them in person.

Controllers will, when you go into a tower, a TRACON, or center for a visit, go out of their way to explain anything that you ask about. And when you are flying, talking with them over the radio, they will do everything they can to accommodate any request that you make.

Call and tell them you are a pilot and would like to come for a visit. Some have a scheduled program, others will try to handle you on an individual basis. If you are a member of a local flying group, you should be able to get a controller to come to a meeting and talk to the group. Another thing that direct contact with controllers will do is sharpen communication skills. Just knowing a few of them makes dealing with all of them a more relaxed affair.

F-35A Lightning II Demo Team, Thunderbirds to dominate the skies at SUN ‘n FUN

The 2020 SUN ‘n FUN Aerospace Expo will be the first East Coast stop for the U. S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II Demo Team.

Also performing at the 2020 airshow, which is slated March 31 to April 5, will be the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds.

THE THUNDERBIRDS.

“Having both demonstration teams as part of our 2020 SUN ‘n FUN airshow lineup is a privilege,” said Greg Gibson, CMO and Air Show Director for SUN ‘n FUN Fly-in. “Aviation enthusiasts know how special it is to have these teams at our event so come Experience Flight in 2020 and be prepared to be wow’d.”

The F-35A Lightning II Demo Team’s performance by the Air Combat Command and the 388th Fighter Wing will showcase the U.S. Air Force’s newest fifth-generation fighter that provides next-generation stealth, enhanced situational awareness, and reduced vulnerability through its aerodynamic performance and advanced integrated avionics.

 

THE F-35A LIGHTNING II.

The team’s performance pushes the aircraft to its limits as they pull off the kind of aerial acrobatics that can give even the most casual observer a thrill, SUN ‘n FUN officials note.

“The mission of these demonstration teams complements the overall objective of the SUN ‘n FUN Aerospace Expo, which is the largest fundraising event for the Aerospace Center of Excellence (ACE),” said John “Lites” Leenhouts, CEO/President. “The opportunity to connect with America at an event like ours and, as a result, inspire the next generation of aerospace professionals in whatever path they choose, is invaluable for our engagement with youth, as well as the Air Force’s goal of recruitment.”

Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers

The forum room at AirVenture’s Pilot Proficiency Center off Boeing Plaza is nearly full as the afternoon sun begins to drive people inside for a few minutes of cool air before the airshow. Even at 83 degrees, it’s still a great day for AirVenture 2019, following the torrential rains earlier in the week that threatened to swamp campers. The Proficiency Center’s forum room is attached to the training hall where a dozen and a half pilots at a time learn the intricacies of IFR and VFR flight on 18 Redbird simulators. In the forum room, there’s training of a different sort going on.

Not surprising, many of the heads in the room are covered either in gray hair or a mop in the midst of that metamorphosis. But there are also quite a few young faces eager to hear one of the many National Air Traffic Controllers Association seminars being presented this week. The forums are the outreach program conceived by the NATCA, the bargaining agent for all 14,331 FAA-employed air traffic controllers, along with 481 controllers at the 102 NATCA-represented federal contract towers. NATCA also represents more than 5,000 other aviation-safety professionals in 14 bargaining units, as well as 56 Department of Defense-employed controllers at five military facilities—not including Andrews Air Force Base which is an FAA tower staffed by union controllers.

No union business is being discussed here today though. The handful of air traffic controllers on duty are poised to answer questions and explain how air traffic controllers perform their critical roles. They’re also hoping to crush some of the myths that exist between people who speak to each other but almost never meet in person. Controllers hear the voices of the pilots in their headsets and often come to know some pilots as friends. Pilots hear those often-familiar voices through their headsets too, but have only that familiar winking light on their transponder to know ATC is there, watching nearly every move.

Relationships like this can strain though when patience levels shrink during an in-flight emergency or when one party underappreciates the job of the other. But solid relationships between pilots and controllers is the foundation upon which our complex air traffic control system—the largest in the world—is built. Each side needs the other. Without pilots, controllers would be unnecessary. Without ATC, flying safely would be very much in jeopardy.

Good communications is the two-way street that links pilots and controllers, but it depends upon each side clearly articulating their needs. ATC’s safety-guaranteeing instructions are so specific that controllers demand they be repeated back word-for-word in order to prevent a collision on the ground or in the air. Simple responses like “roger” or “affirmative” only waste time, forcing controllers to repeat information that anyone flying an airplane today should already know how to explain. The NATCA organizes these forums at AirVenture to let the flying public listen to controllers explain some of the common problems they’re often faced with and how to resolve them.

This afternoon’s session, “Don’t Let That Cloud Fool You,” is being facilitated by Indianapolis Center controller Bob Obma who challenged the audience: “Raise your hand if you pay taxes.” Except for the few teenagers in the room, all the hands quickly fly up. “Then you’re already paying for the air traffic system,” he says. “Why not use it?” And so goes the back-and-forth session explaining what center controllers see on their radar and how they can help pilots in distress. Before the hour’s over, the roar of jets departing Wittman Airport’s Runway 36 begins drowning out some of his explanations as the airshow begins.

Pilots of any category would need to be brain-dead not to pick up some valuable operational nuggets from these sessions. In Obma’s session, I’m reminded that radar controllers are only allowed to descend an aircraft to a specific floor altitude to prevent collisions with ground obstacles. Controllers call these their minimum vectoring altitudes. Surprisingly, Obma says, he has no idea why the government doesn’t publish these altitudes anywhere for the rest of us to see.

As summer winds down, the FAA is a tad busy dealing with a number of issues, such as getting the agency’s new administrator, Steve Dickson, up to speed as he tries to untangle some of the knots into which the agency seems to have tied its tail. The NATCA people were eager to help us talk to controllers in the trenches, so to speak. Doug Church and Kelly Richardson of the communications office at NATCA began by reminding me there’s a wealth of pilot/controller resources available on the union’s website.

I spoke to Kelly Richardson a few days after AirVenture, and he detailed the union’s outreach programs called “Talk ATC With NATCA” at the nation’s largest airshow with almost-hourly presentations on nearly a dozen topics. A few include: How to Speak ATC, Communicating with Confidence and Clarity, Best Practices for Avoiding Common Mistakes, and Rarely Used Tools for VFR Pilots.

Richardson says: “We just hit 20 years as an exhibitor at AirVenture. The first presentation was probably 15 years ago. In 2019, we averaged between 135 to 150 people at each presentation, times 24 presentations, so that’s about 3,400 people total.” While that number pales in comparison to the 600,000-plus people who attended AirVenture, these were 3,400 people who very much wanted to know more about that semisecret relationship between pilots and controllers.

Richard Kennington—a controller at the PDX tower in Portland, Oregon—tells me his presentations are driven by a desire to bust up a big myth that still interferes with pilot/controller relationships, “that controllers are all stressed-out people just waiting for a pilot to make a mistake so they can lift their certificate.” Obma and Kennington both confirm, “nothing is further from the truth.”

Working at a Class C-airspace airport, Kennington offers a glimpse of how the tone of a pilot’s voice speaks volumes about their ability to handle a given situation. “I know it’s not good to judge people” by their voices, he says. “Well, I’m here to tell you, I’m constantly judging a pilot’s skills by how they handle the radio.” (Pilots do the same to air traffic controllers, by the way.) “If I see a 3-mile hole on final to get out a departure, but I don’t have confidence in the pilot behind the hold short lines, that airplane isn’t going anywhere.” His criteria? “On initial call, does the pilot prattle on or do they use short, concise wording? Do they use proper phraseology? Do they sound confident?” He makes the discussion practical by talking about radar flight-following services. “Those are [on a] workload-permitting basis, of course, but if it looks like a particular pilot is going to be high maintenance, I may terminate radar with them because I don’t have the time to deal with them.”

Fear not, you pilots already worried about pressing the PTT key; Kennington presents solutions. “If you’re unfamiliar with our [or any ATC] operation, just tell us. Don’t try to fake it. If you’re a student pilot, tell me, and I’ll treat you with kid gloves. I won’t give you complex instructions. I’ll work with you.” He also warns, “Don’t guess at what you think I’m expecting you to do, just ask for a clarification.” When controllers realize a pilot’s new or struggling a bit, they’ll pass this message onto the next controller with, “This guy is unfamiliar, or he’s not doing too well today, so keep an eye on him.” Kennington says: “If you just tell me the truth, I automatically become more sympathetic. Then if you make a mistake, I’m not all that upset.” It’s not a sign of weakness to utter, “Please say again.”

Kennington spoke to pilots about understanding the big picture of what’s going on around them. At Portland, “I’ll often have Southwest taxi out and tell me he’s ready for an immediate if I need it. That tells me this guy has been listening on the radio and has great situational awareness. The same applies when someone says they’re happy to take off VFR and pick up their IFR clearance in the air.”

Just as pilots start out knowing next to nothing about how an airplane flies or how to handle the radio smoothly, air traffic controllers must learn the biz as well. Pilots should know though that ATC trainees always work under the guiding eye of a fully certified instructor. There simply aren’t enough air traffic controllers to go around these days, so expect to hear controllers on the radio who might be a bit unsure of themselves. Once a trainee controller has enough experience to handle a tower frequency or radar position alone—a process that can take years—they become certified professional controllers.

I asked Kennington what gets under a controller’s skin the most. He didn’t even hesitate with his answer. “VFR airplanes that skirt the edge of our airspace and never talk to us. Their navigation equipment is so good these days, pilots can do this and be incredibly accurate about not entering our airspace. But just because it’s legal doesn’t make it smart—or safe.”

The top of Portland’s Class C is 4,000 feet, for example, and that makes it legal for a VFR airplane to overfly at 4,500 feet and never call ATC, radar service in that outer area being voluntary and all. “But sometimes those VFRs at 4,500 feet end up flying right into my departure corridor. That’s when we start using what I call “ninja” vectors to keep the departures away from the VFRs. Once they overfly, they’ll end up in my arrival corridor next, which is just as bad.” Importantly, the VFR pilot probably had no idea they were even impacting Portland’s traffic. They may even think they’re helping controllers by not wasting their time. “We’d much rather talk to these people,” Kennington says.

Kennington repeated one of the most common questions he hears from pilots. “What should I say when I first call in?” He suggests pilots “make the initial conversation as simple as possible. First, of course, listen to the frequency, and be sure you’re not about to cut off someone who is already talking.” When you’re ready, he says, “Just tell me who you are, where you are and what you want from me.” For instance, “Portland, Citabria 9MK, 15 east at 2,500 feet, inbound with ATIS Mike.”

Kennington says controllers prefer pilots to be short and concise, especially if there are already quite a few other airplanes on the frequency. “Please don’t give us your life story on initial call,” he says. Another problem he runs across much too often are pilots in trouble for one reason or another who wait too long to call for help, such as when they’re running low on fuel. “If pilots wait too long, the options we have available to help are very limited,” he says.